Course 7.1Lesson 1 of 3
Oxidation and reduction began as the gain and loss of oxygen and hydrogen. A better idea is electron transfer: oxidation is the loss of electrons and reduction is the gain, and the two always happen together. A reducing agent gives electrons and an oxidising agent takes them. Zinc in copper(II) sulfate shows one metal winning the competition for electrons.
This lesson is free to read. Enroll free to keep your place in the course.
Try the code and the simulations beside the lesson.
An iron nail rusts. A cut apple turns brown. A candle burns. A battery runs. Each of these is a redox reaction. The name joins two words, reduction and oxidation, because the two always happen together.
The word oxidation comes from oxygen. Early chemists used it for any change in which a substance burned in air or combined with oxygen. The opposite change, the removal of oxygen, they called reduction. Later the idea grew to include hydrogen and other elements.
Here are some examples.
Magnesium gains oxygen, so magnesium is oxidised.
Copper(II) oxide loses oxygen, so it is reduced. Hydrogen gains oxygen, so it is oxidised.
Hydrogen sulfide loses hydrogen, so it is oxidised. Chlorine gains hydrogen, so it is reduced.
Iron(III) chloride loses chlorine, which is electronegative, so it is reduced. Hydrogen gains chlorine, so it is oxidised.
Look at the copper oxide reaction again. Something is oxidised and something is reduced in the same change. A substance cannot be oxidised unless another substance is reduced. That is why we say redox.
The classical idea cannot explain a reaction such as sodium burning in chlorine, where no oxygen or hydrogen is involved. A simpler idea works for every case. Look at magnesium burning in oxygen. We can split the change into two parts.
Each part is a half-reaction. In the first, magnesium atoms lose electrons. In the second, oxygen molecules gain them. We now define the two words by electrons.
A memory aid is OIL RIG: oxidation is loss, reduction is gain. Add the two half-reactions and the electrons cancel. The electrons lost by one species are exactly the electrons gained by the other.
The species that takes the electrons is the oxidising agent, or oxidant. It is itself reduced. The species that gives the electrons is the reducing agent, or reductant. It is itself oxidised. In the magnesium reaction, oxygen is the oxidising agent and magnesium is the reducing agent.
Dip a zinc rod into blue copper(II) sulfate solution. After a few minutes the blue colour fades. The rod becomes coated with a red-brown layer of copper, and the solution warms a little. The two half-reactions are:
Adding them gives the overall reaction:
Zinc is the reducing agent. Copper(II) is the oxidising agent. Now turn the experiment round. Dip a copper rod into zinc sulfate solution and nothing happens. Zinc has won the competition for electrons.
Try one more. Dip a copper rod into silver nitrate solution. Shiny crystals of silver grow on the rod, and the solution slowly turns blue:
So copper beats silver, and zinc beats copper. As reducing agents, the order is zinc, then copper, then silver. As oxidising agents, the ions go the other way: is strongest and is weakest. A later course turns this competition into a number, the electrode potential.
Move the slider. How many moles of electrons pass for each mole of zinc? Is the copper gained heavier or lighter than the zinc lost?
The program counts the electrons and the masses when zinc dissolves in copper(II) sulfate.
Try each one on your own first. If you are stuck, open a hint. Then check with Show the answer.
Every lesson is open to read. Enrolling also lets you:
Log in to join the discussion.
Loading…