In a Young's double-slit experiment, light of wavelength in air falls on two narrow slits S1 and S2, a distance apart. The screen is from the slits. The central bright fringe sits at O, on the line that is the same distance from both slits. A thin transparent plastic sheet, of thickness and refractive index , is now stuck over slit S1 only, as the figure shows. Only the sheet changes the paths of the two beams. The sheet is so thin that the sideways shift of the light inside it can be ignored. Afterwards, the whole apparatus, sheet included, is put under water of refractive index , with the same wavelength in air and the same distances.
Have you tried it?
Work it out on paper first. It is fine to get stuck or make a mistake: that is how we learn. When you are ready, go through the solution one step at a time, and check each step against your own.
Plan. The fringe width depends on the wavelength in the medium. The shift of the pattern depends on the extra optical path that the sheet adds.
(a) Fringe width in air. .
(b) Shift in air. The sheet adds an optical path to the beam from S1. The central fringe moves towards S1 by .
(c) In fringe widths. . The same number comes from .
(d) Fringe width under water. The wavelength in water is , so .
(e) Shift under water. Now the extra optical path is only . The condition for equal optical paths reads , so .
Answer: (a) . (b) . (c) . (d) . (e) .
Check. Solve numerically for the point of the screen where the two optical paths are equal. It lies from O in air and from O under water. Under water the shift is fringe widths, which equals .
Watch out. The shift does not shrink by the factor as the fringe width does, because the sheet adds a much smaller extra path under water. Using under water would give , which is wrong. The shift is toward the sheet, the slit that gets the extra optical path.
Log in to join the discussion.
Loading…
Try it on paper first. A hint, the key idea and the worked solution are here when you need them.