Try it on paper first. A hint, the key idea and the worked solution are here when you need them.
A student adds silver nitrate straight to the sodium fusion extract of a compound that has both nitrogen and sulphur, and sees a black precipitate. The student writes that the compound holds a halogen. Is that right? Explain, and say what should have been done first.
Carbon is shown by carbon dioxide turning lime water milky, and hydrogen by water turning white copper sulphate blue. Fusion with sodium turns N, S and the halogens into CN, S and X ions. Nitrogen: Prussian blue. Sulphur: black PbS or violet with nitroprusside. Nitrogen and sulphur together: blood red . Halogens: boil with nitric acid first, then silver nitrate. Phosphorus: a yellow colour with ammonium molybdate.
Have you tried it?
Work it out on paper first. It is fine to get stuck or make a mistake: that is how we learn. When you are ready, go through the solution one step at a time, and check each step against your own.
Step 1. The black solid. The extract holds cyanide and sulphide ions. Sulphide gives black silver sulphide, , and cyanide gives a white precipitate of silver cyanide.
Step 2. The conclusion. A black precipitate is a sign of sulphur. It says nothing about a halogen.
Step 3. The fix. Boil the extract with dilute nitric acid first. It drives off hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulphide. Only a halide is then left to react with silver ions.
Answer: no, the claim is wrong. The extract should have been boiled with dilute nitric acid first.
Log in to join the discussion.
Loading…